Citation: Fichten, C.S., Asuncion, J., & Barile, M. (1999). Preliminary research findings and news from the Adaptech Project. Cadsppeak (Newsletter of the Canadian Association of Disability Service Providers in Post Secondary Education), 1(2), 4-5.

Preliminary research findings and news from the Adaptech Project

Catherine S. Fichten, Ph.D., Jennison Asuncion, B.A., and Maria Barile, M.S.W.
Adaptech Project
Dawson College, 3040 Sherbrooke St. West, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3Z 1A4

Computer and information technologies have the potential both of enhancing the lives of students with disabilities in colleges and universities as well as of denying them equality of access to higher education. To explore issues related to computer use in the Canadian context we recently concluded a preliminary investigation evaluating the views and opinions of both students with disabilities and Disabled Student Services professionals concerning the use of computers in postsecondary education.

For the past year we have been working on a project in partnership with the National Educational Association of Disabled Students (NEADS). After conducting a series of focus groups, we carried out an interview study of postsecondary students with disabilities and service providers and resource persons across Canada.

Participants were 37 Canadian college and university students and 30 Disabled Student Services personnel. Students were enrolled in community and junior colleges, universities, and postsecondary distance education institutions in all 10 Canadian provinces and both territories. A minimum of 1 college and 1 university student per province was interviewed. Because neither the Yukon nor the Northwest territories have universities, only college students from the territories were interviewed. Where available, both English and French institutions were sampled. Both computer users and non-users were interviewed. Although our sample had geographic representation from various areas and constituencies across Canada, the sample was by no means random and the findings need to be interpreted with caution.

Structured interviews were conducted in the spring of 1998. Interviews with students were conducted either by telephone or via TTD. 17 groups of questions were posed. Interviews lasted between 20 minutes and 1-1/2 hours. Service providers were asked 18 groups of questions. Several of these were identical to questions asked of students. Interviews with service providers also lasted between 20 minutes and 1-1/2 hours.

Findings from our interview study indicate that students had a variety of disabilities: learning disabilities, visual and hearing impairments, mobility and neuromuscular impairments as well as medical and psychiatric conditions.

The findings also indicate that colleges in our sample had the largest proportion of students with disabilities who made themselves known to service providers: approximately 3-1/2 % of the student body. Universities, including distance universities, had only approximately 1-1/2 %. Neither the size of the city nor the size of the postsecondary educational institution was related to the proportion of students with disabilities on campus.

The results indicate that about 1/2 of the student sample had 2 or more impairments, suggesting the need for adapted work stations which can accommodate the needs of students with various disabilities. This recommendation is supported by other aspects of the findings which indicate that over 80% of institutions had students who are hard of hearing and use the oral approach, have learning disabilities, are partially sighted, have mobility impairments or use a wheelchair, have medical or psychiatric impairments, or have problems using their arms or hands. Fewer institutions reported students who are deaf and use sign or students who are totally blind.

In spite of their smaller numbers, students who are blind had the largest array of technologies at their disposal. The results indicate that popular solutions, such as software that reads what is on the screen, are used not only by students who are blind but also by students who have low vision and, increasingly, by students who have a learning disability. Use of large screen monitors is another instance of this trend to "cross-use" technologies.

Voice input software, an increasingly popular option, and scanners are two technological solutions that are used not only by students with learning disabilities, but also by those who have a variety of impairments involving mobility and use of hands and arms. Multiple uses of adaptive technologies seems to be an emerging trend. Thus, it is becoming increasingly important to ensure that different types of adaptive equipment can work together. In particular, the heavy hardware and training demands of dictation software should be taken into consideration.

Architectural adjustments, such as adjustable work stations, are also simple solutions that go a long way in making computers accessible. Better awareness of what is available for students who are Deaf or hard of hearing is an important issue.

The data indicate that service providers in increasing numbers are using the internet as a means of getting information about what equipment and adaptations are out there for students, and they are primarily teaching themselves how to use the equipment. Students, too, are primarily self-taught, but they generally learn about available hardware and software from their friends or families. Wish lists of both service providers and students include "more and better" of everything as well as easy to use voice control and dictation software.

There is an even split among institutions that keep their adaptive technology in one central location and those that decentralise their equipment. Similarly, about half of all institutions have a loan program, while the rest do not. In general, smaller institutions are less likely to have specialized computer technologies for their students.

A related issue concerns hours of availability, with over 80% of institutions indicating weekend and evening access to adapted equipment mainly through sign-in/sign-out procedures. All institutions studied had access to the internet, but only 1/2 had adapted computers with internet access. All institutions consulted staff and students about equipment purchases, but only about 20% of institutions had broad-based, formal consultative committees.

Internet access and access to the graphical environment of Windows are rapidly becoming a key concern in postsecondary educational institutions. The data also show a trend toward multidisciplinary and multisectorial decision making as well as toward integrated mainstream computer labs. Additionally, there was overall agreement that institutional administrations need to recognize the importance of these technologies for students with disabilities.

The implications of the findings are clear: students with disabilities can and do use computer and information technologies to help them succeed in postsecondary education. Organizations which support students in this effort need to make money available both to individual students as well as to colleges and universities. Moreover, because about 1/2 of the students surveyed did not know that funding programs existed to help them to obtain needed equipment, information concerning the availability of programs needs more broadly based dissemination.

If you are interested in receiving a more detailed presentation of the findings, contact Catherine Fichten at Dawson College, 3040 Sherbrooke St. West, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3Z 1A4 (tel: 514-931-8731 #1546, e-mail:

Other Projects of the Adaptech Team

The Adaptech Project consists of a team of academics, students, consumers, and professionals interested in computer, information and adaptive technologies used by students with disabilities in colleges and universities. Our goal is to provide empirically based information to assist in decision making that ensures that new policies, software and hardware reflect the needs and concerns of a variety of individuals: (1) students with disabilities, (2) professors who teach them, and (3) resource persons and service providers who make technological, adaptive, and other supports available to the higher education community.

In addition to the research described above, our team is also involved in other activities, including both empirical research and demonstration projects. The ongoing activities of the team are funded by several organizations: the Office of Learning Technologies (OLT), the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC), as well as by the Programme d'aide a la recherche sur l'enseignement et l'apprentissage (PAREA).

Our current ongoing study, which involved the distribution of a survey to over 3000 students, should provide definitive information about concerns, views, and experiences with computers of Canadian postsecondary students with disabilities. In this massive endeavour we have had the active support of more than 200 student services professionals from colleges and universities across Canada. We are most grateful to these individuals for helping to distribute our questionnaire. To ensure the broadest representation, our questionnaire was produced in both English and French in the following formats: regular and large print, audio tape, Braille, and IBM and Mac disks. Results of this larger study should be available 6 months to a year from now. If we have not gotten in touch with you and you are interested in the study, please contact one of us.

An exciting new project for us involves focusing on computers in Québecís CEGEPs by conducting an in-depth study of the needs, views, and concerns both of service providers and of students with disabilities. We are carrying out this project in partnership with the Quebec student group [líAssociation québécoise des étudiants handicapés au postsecondaire (AQEHPS)] and with the western Québec group of CEGEP service providers [Service d'aide à l'intégration des élèves (SAIDE)].

Our core research team includes a multi-talented group of students, research assistants, and professionals: Myrtis Fossey, Christian Généreux, Jean-Pierre Guimont, Darlene Judd, Jason Lavers, Evelyn Reid, and Chantal Robillard. We have also had the active collaboration of several Montreal area student services professionals, including Joan Wolforth, Alice Havel, André Leblanc and Joanne Senécal. Other service providers have given active support to our team by serving on our Advisory Board, sharing their experiences, helping to refine our questionnaire, or actively participating on our listserv: Leo Bissonnette, Daniel Fiset, Gladys Loewen, Karen McCall, Janet Mee, Chris Mercer, Bruce Mesman, Ruth Walsh, Maria-Teresa Zenteno. We would like to thank these individuals, as well as the many whose names do not appear here but who have made significant contributions to our research.

To date, we have published articles, presented at exhibitions and conferences, and set up a bilingual web page that you can visit at We will soon present aspects of our findings at CSUN '99. We also have an electronic discussion list on the Internet which is moderated by Jennison Asuncion. You can join the list by e-mailing We look forward to hearing from you!